The spirit at the end says “I BELIEVE IT SO” typo by me and “OFF”, should read “OF”, sorry nobody perfect especially me, except GOD.

EVP Abortion and Hell

VACCINES SAVE LIVES, but some companies and individuals only care about PROFIT.
This is an unjust alternative choice for parents to have to make morally, which must be eliminated as soon as possible.

The spirit uses the phrase, “Sort of”, they say that to me only when there are some exceptions to the rule. They did not tell me what they are yet.


But it costs more, something they don’t like to hear in business.. Has for those getting a wage, its still making money out of human suffering even thaw it saves lives. You know it can be done another way.

This also goes for experiments on Human fetuses tissue, cosmetics that use fetuses. Also human foods have enhanced flavours developed from human foetuses.
ESPECIALLY TRANSHUMANISM, mixing animal and Human DNA together, big NO NO.

Human cells from the tissue of aborted fetuses have been used in vaccines since the 1960s, and currently they are used in 11 vaccines. Aborted human fetal cell cultures are used for growing viruses, which are then used in the preparation of inactivated and live virus vaccines.

Yes I spelt “of” as “off” lol nobody is perfect, especially me.

So no misunderstanding, please read below:

Life comes first…like in abortion of children. If both life of mother and child are in danger. The exception is made for this, even by God,” Life comes first”. The only exception I should say on abortion. ….Same goes for vaccines…VACCINES SAVE LIVES SHOULD BE USED TO SAVE LIVES.

Yes there are issues that vaccines cause side effects, this is another topic not dealt with here in this evp.

The Mortal sin is there’s for how they develop it and make money from using dead babies. The issue of this EVP is not about taking vaccines to save lives. It’s about those mentioned in it, making money out of it. If you can find an alternative vaccine that does not use DEAD babies, please use it.
If not life comes first, safety of population but this is a unjust choice when alternatives can be used instead of human fetuses.

A) Live vaccines against rubella8:
the monovalent vaccines against rubella Meruvax®!! (Merck) (U.S.), Rudivax® (Sanofi Pasteur, Fr.), and Ervevax® (RA 27/3) (GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium);
the combined vaccine MR against rubella and measles, commercialized with the name of M-R-VAX® (Merck, US) and Rudi-Rouvax® (AVP, France);
the combined vaccine against rubella and mumps marketed under the name of Biavax®!! (Merck, U.S.),
the combined vaccine MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) against rubella, mumps and measles, marketed under the name of M-M-R® II (Merck, US), R.O.R.®, Trimovax® (Sanofi Pasteur, Fr.), and Priorix® (GlaxoSmithKline UK).
B) Other vaccines, also prepared using human cell lines from aborted foetuses:
two vaccines against hepatitis A, one produced by Merck (VAQTA), the other one produced by GlaxoSmithKline (HAVRIX), both of them being prepared using MRC-5;
one vaccine against chicken pox, Varivax®, produced by Merck using WI-38 and MRC-5;
one vaccine against poliomyelitis, the inactivated polio virus vaccine Poliovax® (Aventis-Pasteur, Fr.) using MRC-5;
one vaccine against rabies, Imovax®, produced by Aventis Pasteur, harvested from infected human diploid cells, MRC-5 strain;
one vaccine against smallpox, AC AM 1000, prepared by Acambis using MRC-5, still on trial.

there is a grave responsibility to use alternative vaccines and to make a conscientious objection with regard to those which have moral problems;
as regards the vaccines without an alternative, the need to contest so that others may be prepared must be reaffirmed, as should be the lawfulness of using the former in the meantime insomuch as is necessary in order to avoid a serious risk not only for one’s own children but also, and perhaps more specifically, for the health conditions of the population as a whole – especially for pregnant women;
the lawfulness of the use of these vaccines should not be misinterpreted as a declaration of the lawfulness of their production, marketing and use, but is to be understood as being a passive material cooperation and, in its mildest and remotest sense, also active, morally justified as an extrema ratio due to the necessity to provide for the good of one’s children and of the people who come in contact with the children (pregnant women);
such cooperation occurs in a context of moral coercion of the conscience of parents, who are forced to choose to act against their conscience or otherwise, to put the health of their children and of the population as a whole at risk. This is an unjust alternative choice, which must be eliminated as soon as possible.

source: https://indiancinema-analysis.com

Xem thêm các bài viết về Sức Khỏe: https://indiancinema-analysis.com/category/suc-khoe/

Related Post


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *